"I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together. See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly. I'm crying."
-- The Beatles
"The Best lack all conviction, while the Worst / Are full of passionate intensity. / Surely some revelation is at hand"
-- W.B. Yeats
"God has shown strength with his arm, has scattered the Proud in the imaginations of their hearts. God has brought down
the Powerful from their thrones, and lifted up the Lowly; he has filled the Hungry with good things -- and sent
the Rich away empty."
-- Mary
Two thousand years later, Mary is right -- again.
Here at Spirit Scholars, we've been charting this cultural tsunami through the autumn, but the cacophony of year-end voices is demonstrating conclusively that what many of us (including Wired Magazine) call Crowdsourcing is emerging as The Most Important Cultural Trend of the year. Truth be told, if you read through our coverage of this trend, it's obvious that this shift in Cultural Authority -- from Professionals to All of Us -- has been unfolding for a long time.
(For instance, Click here to jump to our first Crowdsourcing article -- or Click here to read our coverage of YouTube, which turned out to be the technological harbinger of Crowdsourcing for many, especially when it became obvious just how much money that little online video venture was worth: Billions!)
THIS WEEK, though, anyone can see the Handwriting on these Walls. One only has to glance around the landscape this week to see that Crowdsourcing -- or whatever else people are calling it -- is truly triumphant.
So, HERE is our VISION-Starter question for today: Are we witnessing a wonderful Lifting Up of the Lowly, full of grace and creative compassion, OR are all of us are becoming Proud and Lost in our self-centered Imaginations -- OR as Yeats warned, are we seeing the ominous rise of the "Worst," using all their "Passionate Intensity" to reshape the world in their own image?
Not sure what Signs we're seeing? Well, in recent days, the New York Times and Time Magazine seem to have jointly fired the starter's pistol on the rising consensus -- and they've even occasionally fired pistols back and forth at each other over the trend. Click here to read our earlier story on the NYTimes' opening shot.
In retrospect, that early-December piece in the Times Arts section seems downright tentative compared with Time Magazine's controversial decision to award its now-legendary Person of the Year award to: YOU.
If you missed it, here's a brief snippet of Lev Grossman's Time Magazine cover story, explaining the concept. (And Time Magazine back issues now are easily available online, if you care to read the rest of the cover story.) But, here's just a brief quote from Grossman's piece: "The 'Great Man' theory of history ... took a serious beating this year. To be sure, there are individuals we could blame for the many painful and disturbing things that happened in 2006. ... But look at 2006 through a different lens and you'll see another story, one that isn't about conflict or great men. It's a story about community and collaboration on a scale never seen before. It's about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people's network YouTube and the online metropolis MySpace. It's about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes."
HOWEVER, the team at the New York Times fired back a mighty salvo this past Sunday. Frank Rich, a former Time Magazine staffer himself, took aim squarely at that Person of the Year cover story and fired both barrels. First, he called it "a bountiful gift of mirth" and spent the entire first column of his Sunday piece scoffing at the Times editors.
Beyond the acidic opening, Rich had a serious point in this skewering. In
the middle of his piece, he finally got to the heart of his argument:
"As our country sinks deeper into a quagmire -- and even a conclusive
Election Day repudiation of the war proves powerless to stop it -- we
the people, and that includes, yes, you, will seek out any escape hatch we can find. In the Iraq era, the dropout nostrums of choice are not the drugs and drug culture of Vietnam but the equally self-gratifying and narcissistic pastimes of the Internet. Why not spend hour upon hour passionately venting in the blogosphere, as Time suggests, about our 'state of mind or the state of the nation or the steak-frites at the new bistro down the street'? Or an afternoon surfing from video to video on YouTube, where short-attention-span fluff is infinite? It's more fun than the nightly news, which, as Laura Bush reminded us this month, has been criminally lax in unearthing all those 'good things that are happening' in Baghdad."
To illustrate Rich's column, a large Barry Blitt sketch atop the page showed a comfortable, middle-aged American blissfully reading a magazine in his easy chair -- as his poor little dog looks anxiously out the window at flames rising and explosions rocking the world.
GULP! That's definitely 1 Vote for BOTH "Lost in our Imagination" AND Yeats' "Worst" theories about what's unfolding.
As 2006 dwindles, more votes are falling like snowflakes in a Denver blizzard.
U.S. News & World Report's Year-End cover story suggests -- thankfully -- that people should use their newfound Authority wisely. The U.S. News editors actually suggest that people start reading more books about the larger world, learn more about Islam and think about organizing grassroots book-discussion groups to increase our awareness of the larger world. Bravo to U.S. News for that strong word of advice!
But, there also are enough silly snowflakes to obscure such wisdom. Sometimes these little notes are so silly that we suspect they're really votes for the Beatles' absurdist hymn in which meanings tumble over each other until we lose all perspective.
A Low Point in New York Times coverage, for instance, appeared in this morning's special "Year in Food" section, which declared: "Professional chefs took a back seat to home cooks and home cooking in 2006." To be fair to Times writer Julia Moskin, there was a business-related point buried in her article -- that TV producers and publishers seem more interested, at the moment, in highlighting unknown cooks rather than already-famous ones. But much of Moskin's story was padded with New York snobbery and observations too obvious to be called news (for instance, that circulation is growing for cooking magazines aimed at ordinary people). And the overall thrust of the story -- saluting the culinary skills of millions of Americans -- is virtually another voice in the choir of Time Magazine's own Hymn to Commoners, which the New York Times already had ridiculed on Sunday. Or, as the Beatles put it "I am he as you are he as ..."
If we sound inappropriately amused by all of this, then you've missed our purpose here at Spirit Scholars. We are provocative here, because our whole purpose at Spirit Scholars -- and the Ann Arbor-based Center for Spirituality in American Life -- is to scan the horizon for signs of changes in spirituality, culture, media and values. Our whole purpose is to slice through mists, throw open windows, hang up mirrors, encourage fresh strategies for enlarging and focusing our vision. And, then, we want to open up a safe forum for people to pause, reflect and, if they wish, comment by dropping us a line. (Feel free -- Click here to email your thoughts to us.)
So, we'll close VISION 02 / Crowdsourcing VI with one last Mirror: The Mirror of Galadriel from J.R.R. Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings." If you're a Rings fan, you know what we're talking about already. If not, this particular mirror is a basin of water that summons visions from the horizon. THE KEY to this mirror's power, however, is its mystery. Galadriel cannot predict what viewers will see in this mirror -- or whether what they see will actually unfold.
We like that image. It describes the little pool of reflective water that we're tending here -- just for You.
















Recent Comments